
First, let me start off with a third-grade-book-report statement. For context! *** <3 *** (@). “Exit Through the Gift Shop” is a documentary about “street art.”
Sort of.
It is also a documentary about the film’s maker, or makers, plural*: both Banksy my (and everyone else who isn’t on Fairey’s jock’s) favorite street artist, and ****OMG, YOU IDIOT, SPOILER ALERT**** the documentarian-turned-street artist Terry Guetta, this impossibly-flawed, fascinating flaneur-hack. At some point during the filming of the doc, Banksy himself takes over the production, and like his art, a seemingly simple narrative explodes into a twisted, philosophically saturated, self-questioning, self-mocking tale.
Second, let me say that I have a love/hate relationship with Cambridge, where I saw the film. At the same time, the place, where I call home, is progressive and cliché, intelligent but trite, privileged in ways most people on the planet salivate over and yet complacent about basic community care, hyperconscious and naive, infused with youth and filled with old, dying hippies, driving their (biodiesel!) BMW to vote Democrat at the nearest public school that they don’t send their grandchildren to. It’s populated with both Harvard and the hood, which I love, but there is nary another brown face in Kendall Square cinema. This is important because this is a film about “street art,” n’est pas? A film about a movement that comes from the graffiti of a much blacker NYC, and is informed not only by canonical (read: European/Euro-American) art, but also the commodified pop cultures of “hip-hop” and “urban life.”** Oh, that means black folk. So, it’s weird, if not surprising, that there’s no black folk in the audience of this film besides me (black in the Obama’s census form” usage of the term, of course). In Cambridge.

To continue on this diatribe would take away from the review but it’s an important point to make: For all of the questions of class, race, oppression, and the power of the dollar, Shep Fairey and Banksy (who is faceless, and therefore raceless- we see hands but hands can mean anything. [Someone has since pointed me to a picture of his face and I'm blocking it out forever.] The absence of a face means he’s effectively gamed this system. Who knows and who cares about Banksy’s race? Well played, and good for you, sir.) may do well to ask questions about why their “street art” is revered, sold, popularized, gallerized, and taught, while a “graffiti” movement 30+ years old, with a different complexion remains illicit, and on the streets.*** Not that I think there’s a simple answer to that question…
But who can ask ANY of these questions better than Banksy? And who has the balls to? Just showing the balls and the brains of his work fills me with such joy (not to mention feeling like the film is and of itself, one of the biggest questions of all, about truth and purpose and what a documentary is) -not unlike the quasi-orgasmic feeling I get when hearing the last movement of part 1 of The Rite of Spring, trying on a La Perla bra, or staring at Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?, etc. (or, if I can bougie-balance a bit here, listening to Unknown Pleasures, trying on the perfect pair of jeans, and seeing a significant other pimp out one’s karaoke skills on Twitter.). Seeing Banksy actually risk his life (and the lives of his assistants) to paint the wall separating Israel and Palestine with stuff that looks like this:

Well, heart explosions, on multiple levels. That’s not even the most brilliant of his work- it’s merely the most ballsy. Artists- ask yourself if the piece you’re working on would be finished if someone was shooting warning shots at your head to stop. No? Good. If yes, kindly apologize to your parents. Your haircut is enough to make them disown you.